Pandering to Hollywood
Well, I finally saw Kung Fu Panda last night. Pretty good and quite funny, though with all the hype it couldn't help but be a bit of a letdown. I did wonder what they spent the 130 million dollars on. All those stars' voices might have something to do with it I suppose. But it also left me a little puzzled about some of the agonizing that has been going on in China about the film. It's amusing and has some fairly standard gongfu mythology woven in. But there are no resounding insights into Chinese history or the national character or whatever. If it didn't get made in China it's not because Chinese couldn't but because it would have seemed too obvious, probably. (That's not to take way from the point made in Wu Nan's post below about censorship, which undoubtedly strangles a good many excellent movies at the conception stage.) In this case I think Chinese directors should worry less about this sort of well-produced but fairly predictable fare and get on with their own work. What about a really good movie about the amazing life of the Tang poet Li Bai, for example? (Ok. OK. I m prejudiced. Full disclosure here)
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- A Final Palin Post
- He Had a First Name. It Was O-S-C-A-R.
- Dave & Conan: Who's #1? Depends Who Counts
- Palin's Super Powers Explained
- Swampland Has A New Look!
- Baby Hand-Me-Downs Are Suddenly Trendy
- One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael
- Here's A Test
- All ready to sign up for John Meriwether's next fund?
- Health Care: Back to the Drawing Board
- Why Are Southerners So Fat?
- What Does Life-Extending Drug Mean for Humans?
- The Outsider: Where Is Sarah Palin Going Next?
- Florida Wrestles with Its Python Problem
- Oh Crap! My Parents Joined Facebook
- Obama: Getting Down to the Hard Choices
- After California: Which States Are in the Most Peril?
- Google's Chrome: Taking Aim at Microsoft - and the iPhone
- Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
- Advice from an Economist Who Saw 1929












RSS