Daily commentary about China by TIME correspondents.

Reporters Beaten, Activists Detained; Is Henan a Rogue Province?

Last week Belgian TV reporter Tom Van de Weghe was in the province of Henan with a crew attempting to report on the situation of the hundreds of thousands of HIV sufferers (and the many orphaned children of victims) who contracted the disease while donating blood or receiving transfusions in the late 1990s and early 2000s. (See past reports on this blog, or rather you could if the archive existed. Try this Associated Press summing up up the absurd response by the Henan authorities to Van de Weghe's complaints; or this also by the AP on AIDS activist Lixige's precarious situation). The central government years ago reversed course on AIDs (it had been stonewalling until then) and creditably tries to publicize the issue and lift the stigma that still clings onto sufferers; both President Hu jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao, for example, very publicly visited HIV patients in hospitals in recent days to mark world AIDs day on December 1. But Henan officials remain mired in the dark ages and respond brutally to attempts to document the continued suffering of victims in their province. Van de Weghe found this out the hard way when thugs identified by local villagers as hired by the police beat him up as he was trying to report. (Chinese reporters and activists were reportedly also beaten that day by the same group). They also stole his phone and some 1800 renminbi in cash. As the AP story above reports, Henan officials now say that it wasn't actually police but AIDS patients who attacked him because they were angry about the way they were going to be portrayed (huh?). Oh and by the way, he wasn't beaten or robbed, just jostled. (here's a link the the excellent China Media Project's full translation of this particular whopper). This is apparently a tactic learned at the school that believes blaming the victim is the best strategy. 

About a year and a half ago I visited the brave AIDS campaigner, Doctor Gao Yaojie in the Henan capital, Zhengzhou. She was more or less under house arrest (at 83 a clear threat) and depressed to the point that her friends were worried about suicide, something she mentioned in our talks, never a good sign. Anyway, she told me a story about how officials from her home province always follow her to Beijing when she can get out of her tiny apartment, once attempting to drag her back home when she was on the way to accept an award in the U.S. They arrived soon after she had received a visit in her hotel room from no less a personage than the Deputy Minister of Health, but that cut no ice with the boys from Henan. The same idiotic disconnect between the central government and seemingly rogue Henan officials was on display again this week when Henan native and AIDS campaigner (herself HIV positive; here's a link to the Amnesty report on her case) Lixige was nabbed and forcibly returned home after participating in a ceremony in the Bird's Nest organized by the Ministry of Health to mark world AIDS day. (See the link above for more detail).

The relationship between the provinces and Beijing is one of the most complex and difficult to fathom in China. Usually however, the central government can use it undoubted muscle in situations where it deems it politically necessary. As the President of the Foreign Correspondents Club of China said in a statement, the attack on Van de Weghe is a outrageous (even by Henan standards), a "disgrace to Henan and China". The fate of Li and other similar cases recently (including the forcible deporting from the province of Christian Science Monitor reporter Peter Ford, who was working on a story about Christianity in Henan; details in FCCC link above) just confirms how far off the reservation Henan seems to have drifted. But is it enough for Beijing to even slap a few wrists? Despite the fact it must be personally infuriating for Hu and Wen to see such a public repudiation of their attempts to do the right things on AIDS, I don't think so. Some temporary bad publicity aside, there's no real upside to using up its political capital on this one. Now if it involved money or some sort of threat to Beijing's authority, that would be a different matter.....

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (16)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    A tip on Dutch language last names that start with words like 'van' or 'de': When they are written without a first name, 'Van' is capitalized. However, when written with a first name, they become lowercased. So, Van de Weghe, but Tom van de Weghe.

  • 2

    [...] Blog Info on Henan-Beijing relations By justrecently The relationship between the provinces and Beijing is one of the most complex and difficult to fathom in China. Usually however, the central government [...]

  • 3

    "The central government years ago reversed course on AIDs" ? Years ? Is that decades, or a few years. Makes a difference.

  • 4

    Actually, PRC has never been an intact sovereignty as to administrative and jutical system, not to mention Taiwan which is physically independent. Another term: Federation of China would be more advisable for foreigners to observe and penetrate this chaotic country. This report is another textbook case for"red outside but blue inside","monarchism outside, self-determination inside"if not anarchism. Funny thing is people call Shanghai autonomous city, but the thing is all provinces and cities are de facto autonomies except for Beijing. The top brass in Beijing are no more than puppets teased by local tycoons and PLA shoguns. Refering to the incoming economical crisis and social unrest, Hu and Wen would cling on to the conservative without other choice, cause harmonizing won't work this time. Voices and the rightous can never be harmonized. John Smith's struggle in this blog is a clear proof and can't be clearer that name-calling, propaganda, discrimination...and even gibberish won't and can't work in free world.

  • 5

    "Actually, PRC has never been an intact sovereignty as to administrative and jutical system, not to mention Taiwan"

    You must be kidding. Taiwan, an inalienable part of China, is, of course, totally integrated with the Beijing government, and is totally in compliant with any policy issued by Beijing. If you don't believe that, just ask any Chinese poster here.

  • 6

    John2008obama, maybe you overrated the "autonomy" in provinces and cities. We prefer to call it "out of control" by Beijing sometimes.

    As for the "John Smith", I have some words for "him": When everyone here has known what you are, will your works have any meaning?

    In fact, colluding the gangsters is the CCP government's habitual artifice. They use it frequently and widely since it's efficacious.

  • 7

    JohnSmith: Whatever you say. Fellow. BTW, do you see any Chinese poster here from mainland China? Whom should I ask?

    Conscienceinchina:
    1. Do you really understand what John S really want to say?

    2. I respect your view, but to be serious,"out of control by Beijing sometimes" is seriously understated. It'd be better to say "totally out of control by BJ" at almost all time, but only when something is really out of propaganda's coverage, and censorship's control, then sb. will make it under control and tell the others:Hey, look, it's under control and, of course, shows some whipping boy's face on CCTV.

    Some innocent but gullible people, deluded by a fistful of anti-revolutionary, clashed with armed police and PLA men.
    or
    Some brainwashed but innocent armed police and PLA men, coerced,deluded by a fistful of corrupt, antirevolutionary, lunatic officials and commander, oppressed unarmed, weak people and then seized their farmland.
    It's totally your call.

    3. "In fact, colluding the gangsters is the CCP government's habitual artifice. They use it frequently and widely since it's efficacious."

    It's funny, cause CCP doesn't need to develop any local ganster franchise. CCP is the genuine, and the only legitimate organization that can do anything legally in China without any others' permit. It won't need any goddamn ganster who will ruin it's reputation only. It doesn't need any help even from judicial system which has been discarded decades ago. BTW, CCP is the largest org. of such kind in the world. YOU WANT IN?

  • 8

    "CCP is the genuine, and the only legitimate organization that can do anything legally in China without any others' permit."

    "can do anything legally" ? Anyone can do anything legally. It is the illegal stuff that's tricky, and needs some real clout, like the PLA, to be able to do anything legally or illegally.

    And if the stuff is legal, you should need any permit from anybody. It is the illegal things that you need someone to turn a blind eye on.

  • 9

    For those who insists that India is a shinning example how democracy can work in a developing world with free speech, free election and rule of law, here is a piece of BW article.
    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_50/b4112024094731_page_2.htm
    Pay attention to the part of rampaged corruption, political and ethic violence that happens everywhere daily. People beat the boss of a foreign company in India to death because he wanted to lay off workers.
    Sad. Isn't it.

  • 10

    babou80, The Belgians do not spell it like the Dutch. The article is correct.

  • 11

    So, the autocracy and the CCP are the only choice for the Chinese people, aren't they, sing666?

  • 12

    sing666: I don't see anyone here insists that India is a shinning example....

    conscienceinchina: that's not "the autocracy and the CCP", it's the dictatorship of the upper-class proletarian and socialism with corrupt Chinese characteristic. Just like the "milk outside, the chemical-laced inside".

    John Smith: Sorry for the typo. it should be "illegally". Sorry for hurting your feeling, I know you are a diehard supporter of CCP and preacher of China's superiority.

  • 13

    Thanks for your corrections, John2008Obama, you are an awesome man with plenty of knowledges. Dictator,autocracy, totalitarian, authoritarianism......I am not major in politics and English, so I am not able to distinguish them exactly, but I thing it's really difficult to divide the categories and characters of all the rogue regimes without democracy and freedom, and we don't need to define them since all the rogue countries and regimes are having all such characters.

    As for the topic about "collusion", there are officials colluding mobdom and polices colluding bandits everywhere here. I understand your indignation, because I am having the same. But it's a truth.

  • 14

    conscienceinchina: I don't post here to make any correction, actually. I'm here for fun only, and I appreciate your understanding.

    Just for fun!

  • 15

    [...] Comments (0) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This Earlier this month we related the story of a Belgian television crew that was roughed up by thugs in Henan province while covering a story about AIDS patients. As bad as things can be at [...]

  • 16

    [...] this month we related the story of a Belgian television crew that was roughed up by thugs in Henan province while covering a story about AIDS patients. As bad as things can be at [...]

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The China Blog Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The China Blog in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
ROBB LEVIN, resident of Fairfax, Virginia, on the $15,000 lawsuit settlement made against Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the White House gate crashers, who are also involved in at least 15 other civil suits

Stay Connected with TIME.com