Less Carbon, More Lead

Lead is the last thing on the mind of these people:
http://w8v.sl.pt

Neither have I seen such flattering articles, nor do I care. If they are true, we really need to scan what the "imperialists" want to do. Do they love the smoggy sky, the dark and smelly water and the toxic foods of China, or the money of the plutocrat commies? Maybe "God will first make it cracy if he want it die (天欲其亡,必令其狂)". The CCP will be poisoned to death by the toxins made by themselves, such as Sanlu milk, if you "praise" it further.

“宁可相信妓女，也不相信官员。”这就是由中国网民所反映的真民意。这一调查结果，证实了一种说法：中国人中，真正反共的，在国内，而不在国外。同时也证实：网上那些潮水般的拥共言论，曾被有心人当作“主流民意”来说事，多半属造假，大抵都是由中共当局雇用的写手、线民、网特，即所谓“五毛党”所为。

http://www.rfa.org/mandarin/pinglun/teyuepinglun-08182009112210.html/story_main?textonly=1

"The CCP will be poisoned to death by the toxins made by themselves, such as Sanlu milk, if you "praise" it further."

Did you mean Chinese will be poisoned to death by the CCP... CCP will not poison itself to death. Too many of them have foreign passports. They can escape to safe haven when China is too poisonous to live. And their kids don't drink milk from China. They like foreign stuff.

No. CCP won't suffer at all. CCP members have money.

Ah! A perfect collaboration:
http://wd5.sl.pt

May be factories in China are in this scam too, creating more business for their partners.

Nothing is more toxic than CCP, followed by the China tsunami flooding the world with its exported goons and thugs, then comes to fake food stuff, tainted baby formula, toxic toys, and pirated IPR…..lead is at the bottom of the importance list.

Green technology? My foot!

It's cheap pirated replica and fake green projects to suck in western venture capitals supported by US pension funds. Once happily committed, venture capital collapses and technology is stolen. The red fat cats would launder the swindled money in Las Vegas, buying up real estate in Canada and Australia. Money recycles back to casinos and real estate in the west, this could be the only benefit out of the “Green Transformation”.

Day dreaming! Tony Blair.

What CCP stands for? Cunningness-Cruelty-Piracy

Oh! none wumao, in weekend.

An impressive article:

胡錦濤政權為何大步倒退？(Why Hu Jintao's Regime Reversing sharply?)

http://www.rfa.org/cantonese/commentaries/weipu-08212009123656.html?encoding=traditional

See what my old friend, who is very patriotic overseas Chinese retunee and a real Bolshevik, has to say in his daily column of a "very patriotic" newspaper. If he is not speaking from his heart, then whoelse?

冶煉廠兒童血染成

"再苦，也不能苦了孩子"。 不知是誰帶頭說了這句感人的話，我一聽就銘記心中，我相信天下父母心都是這樣的，如果只有一塊餅乾，一定留給孩子吃，父母絕不會先吃。

貪官污吏狂噬民脂民膏，這些年更是先噬童脂童膏。年前發生的三鹿奶粉事件，我們並不完全了解內幕，但新聞封鎖是沒有用的，內幕總會揭露出來。有本內地新書提到：「三鹿嬰幼兒奶粉獲得了『國家科學技術進步獎』、列入『國家免檢產品』、媒體大肆渲染三鹿有『一千一百道檢測關』、『過硬的產品質量和科學、嚴謹的過程管理』、『值得媽媽信賴』……而三鹿以往的崇高榮譽和政治經濟地位，如今正反襯出企業界、科技界、傳媒界、質檢等監管部門……系統化的缺德或弱智。如果說諸多社會管理部門的精英在客觀上也對祖國花朵下了毒手，也算不上真冤枉了他們。」

我以前在內地讀書，每天都要聽校長老師講「萬惡的舊社會」如何惡劣、如何慘絕人寰，但所舉的事例多是「舊社會鞭子抽我身，母親只會淚淋淋」；比較起三鹿奶粉的殺童不見血，那鞭子實在算不了甚麼。最近陝西省鳳翔縣八百多兒童和湖南省武岡市一千三百多兒童中鉛毒事件，說是禍源都是冶煉廠，真正的禍源就是官僚隊伍的腐敗。

唐代杜荀鶴有詩《再經胡城縣》：「去歲曾經此縣城，縣民無口不冤聲。今來縣宰加朱紱，便是蒼生血染成。」怎麼辦？我看沒有任何人有辦法解決。惟有不斷呼喊「救救孩子！」

Real Bolshevik wanted in China for USD100,000, dead or alive.

There are none!

中国共产党不仅是假货之源,而且中国共产党本身就是世界上最大的假货！中国共产党不仅是伪共产党，而且是伪装成无产阶级革命分子的最大吸血鬼集团！

How to differentiate a fake CCP. Listen to a real Bolshevik had said:

彭德怀对公社干部厉声地说：“老百姓穷得连裤子都没有穿的了，你却在镇上住大瓦房，你能住得安心？公社里还有这样穷苦的老百姓，你这个当官的倒先富起来了，过上好日子了。这在国民党里做官可以，但在共产党里做官就不行！如果我们当官的自己先富起来了，而不去管那些穷人，这就违背了我们当年革命的宗旨，人民就不会再拥护我们，我们自己就要垮台的!就是我们富足了，为官之人也要注意节俭，节俭养性，奢侈丧德，这是封建皇帝朱元璋都明白的道理，我们共产党的干部有的人还不明白。升官发财，这是过去的国民党。当官不发财，一心为人民谋利益，这才是共产党。否则就不是共产党，或者说是假共产党!”

In addition to new methods of fixing net addiction, China found a new way to cure lazy atletes, and encourage Chinese youth to go into professional soccer:

http://w.pb.sl.pt

This is what a defected reporter of People's Daily(人民日報) had to say in Hong Kong yesterday:

中共文化特務滲透海外媒體

他（邱明偉）並指出近年來中共黑手對海外的滲透更加嚴重，“共產黨在海外的文化特務是主要的成員，這些文化特務滲透海外華文報刊、中文網站，隨時替共產黨在國際上對異議人士，包括像我們這種推動民主進程的媒體人，進行詆毀、誹謗。無論是有意還是無意，都會把水攪混，讓真正有罪的、迫害的主體逃脫國際媒體的注意。把自己從一個罪惡的劊子手漂白成無罪羔羊，欺騙國際媒體，欺騙國際社會。這種行為跟早期的文化大革命中的恐怖主義行為有異曲同工之處。”

http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/9/8/24/n2633680.htm

The Propaganda Department of the CPC Central Committee(中宣部) decided recently after serious research and negotiation: give all the internet commentators (wumao) a munificent vacation to await and prepare the greatest task---National Day.

So, the wumao left us temporarily.

johnsmith9876 =conscienceinch… =chinatsunami

Guess what they do for a living!!! China Bashers. In the true bombing spirit of G W Bush and his cronies. Shoo they must be well paid

反党 = 反革命 = 反华

Using your logic, 99.6% of Chinese are "China bashing" inclined, with the exception of 0.4% CCP goons and thugs, who had looted 90% of the national wealth, are deemed to be patriotic.

Which category you belong to?

doris33: The three of us had to be China Bashers just to keep media of the world sort of balance. Three against 1.3 billions makes it a fair game.

You got it right. Good you realise this is a three vs 1.3 billion people game.

It does not worry me, Yeung. It disgusts me.

I am no longer a part of this 1.3 billion people but I still have family members living in China and my heart goes to them. Many oversea Chinese still love their home country and 父老乡亲 they left behind. We love and we do not hate. Take it as a reality like it or not. Many people from different races and different countries migrate to other countries and take up citizenships. I believe a percentage of these migrants return to where they originally come from at certain stage. I am going to be one of them. If you brand migrants who return to their home land as opportunists with no sense of loyalty then that is your problem because I know my love of China and Chinese people has never changed. I have never been asked by Australian government or Australian people to give up or trade in this love. It is you who is trying to deprive me of my rights to love.

At least you do not deny there are Chinese who remain as Australian PR in order to keep their Chinese citizenship.

For your knowledge the difference between a PR and a citizen of Australia is that citizens of Australia can vote but people with PR can not. PR or citizen have the same welfare access. Do not know how did you mange to get to the point to suggest I am a welfare bludger? If you want to see those welfare bludger let me tell you where you can definetely see them outside Chinese Consulate in Sydney. Very time I get there to have my visa sign I see the same group of full time protesters there. Poor thing, I think they are too old or doesnot speak much English to find themself jobs.

I think the possibility of a war breakout between China and Australia is quite remote. The two coutries need each other. The only possible way for Australia to get involved in a war against China is Australia joint the "coalition of the willing" once more. This country always have trouble to keep the US an arm away. After Australia followed the US into the Vietnam and Iraq it is hard to say what will happen next. Unfortunately when I took the citizenship many years ago I did not take all of these into consideration(that was before Iraq War). There is one thing I can tell you. If Australia decided to joint another military invasion again against any country on this planet(Iran or China for example), I would drop my citizenship immediately. I donot want to be part of it and I did not make any commitment to sacrifice my life to invade other nations! That would break my heart. The media's attempts to demonise China has been alarming in recent years. They do that before wars to fool people into accepting the killings of innocent life and destruction of other nations. I think that also alarmed many oversea Chinese and that is part of the reasons why many oversea Chinese speak out against western media.

Hang on, did you actually suggest a war in which China invades Australia? What make you think that way? Does the Chinese army have a history of crossing the ocean to occupy other countries? I understand you love Australia very much. Your feverish love have blinded you from seeing what Australia has done and may do(lets hope that doesnot happen) in the future. Try to imagine Australia as a victim of war while Australian army is one of the occupying power on other nation's land is bit ......

Nice to talk with you. I know my husband and I will return to China but my only son will stay in Australia. He is a little banana person. I have my best wishes for both countries to strengthen their relationship and maintain peace.

I came to Australia with a rosy democracy dream. It is people like you, liberal extremists who shattered my dream. In my dream, Australia was a friendly and democratic nation with no enemies. What happened in the last 10 years had completely changed what I think of democracy. Democracy is indeed an advanced way of governning but it lacks of a mechanism to prevent wars and restrain liberal extremists. Nations are responsible for the path they choose. If they choose to put up with its dictators (many nations did and Chinese chose to put up with their empires for 2000 years) then they pay a price for it. If they chose communism (which happened to China again) then they pay a price for it. These nation will one day learn and develop into democracy at their own pace. In liberal extremests' eyes, all the non-democratic nations are inferior wth their citizens half human. In liberal extremists' strange eyes these countries can be subjected to wars in the name of democracy. China supply African nation weapon for oil? Check out which countries killed one million people, disabled millions, made millions refugees in their own country for what??? That is really for the control of the oil!!!! Not for democracy!!!! After decades of "intrudcing democracy into the middle east", there is no real democracy, not even stability in the middle east. What is there is sufferring and better grib of oil by the America. In the last 10, 20, 30 years which country is constantly at war???? When a country is brutally invaded with a million killed as direct or indirect result of the war, no one is at fault. GWB was voted out? But his party is there and they will legally return. Right? I fail to see any mechanism within the democratic system to prevent similar wars from happening again. Are those Iraqies better off? Yes, they are liberated from a dictator but they now landed in the hands of terrorists who threaten ordinary people's survival every day. Defend our legal and polital system??? Killing humanbeings in millions does not defend our system!!! These wars are setbacks for democracy.

I am a welfare budgers? Only citizens and refugees can claim welfare???? Poor fellow, you do not even know the system that you are so proud of. Do you always make accusations like this against people? China has ambition in Australia's and other pacific island? Evidence? Because they are upset of Australia's defence white paper? I am afraid that is because they feel encircled just like Russia does. If they have ambition of land or natural resources why did not they take one inch of land in the last two border wars in which they won? Why have they been so busy signing border agreement with almost every single neighbouring country? You have such believe based on very little evidence because China has been demonised again, again, and again. I support a taltalitarian government? If I do that is because I do not want to see what happened to Iraq happen to China. If China landed in the hands of liberal extremists like you, Chinese people would not enjoy today's prosperity. What liberal extremists are good at is destruction not construction.

I am instructed by Chinese government to change Australian system from within? My dear fellow Australian, you do not even possess an open mind to accept that people think differently, you are unable to accept different views. It is funny people like you talk about democracy and freedom of speech. Your behaviour is an insult to democracy and freedom of speech. What you have is a cold war mind and a believe that democracy is so perfect that it is entitled to bomb every nation into it without considering the nation's development stage.

Will return on Sunday night or Monday night if you would like to continue this conversation.

Liberal extremists like you have blood on your hands. Unfortunately in today's world order only dictators are trialed.

@kuifromsydney:

"Liberal extremism"??? Please don't make me laugh. You don't even know what the term means. This shows how your training as a CCP propagandist contributes to your own downfall. Take my advice, the techniques of "labelling" and "name-calling" you learnt from the CCP propaganda school do not work very well outside of the PRC. When you try to put a label on somebody in order to demolish their argument or to increase your preceived credibility, you need to do more background searches so that you don't sound like an ignorant gnome.

Liberal extremism is not a concept in Australian political science. In fact it is a concept in any school of political science. But rather, it is a term that's been used rather frequently by the American neo-cons (aka previous supporters of GW Bush) to demonise the Obama administration. If you don't believe me, check it out from The Conservative Hawk Blog.

According to the neo-con, the trademarks of liberal extremists include: holocaust denial, support of 9/11 conspiracy theory, disdain for traditional American value, and non-constitutional interpretation of the Bill of Rights .... etc etc. In short, I think you are more qualified to be a "liberal extremist" than I do.

On that note, you may want to meet your fellow compatriot, a cyber-whaco called Jake McCrann. JM sometimes refers to himself as "Founder of the 100,000 strong Australian jihadi army The Australian Civil War Movement". He vowed to rid Australia of US influence and to usher in a new world order. On top of that, he also vowed to blow up the parliament house, murder John Howard, Kevin Rudd and Kim Beasley in front of their families ...

Enough of digression. Let's come back to the original argument. From my point of view, kuifromsydney has made a total cockup with her effort to support the PRC's United Front effort overseas. She has discredited herself when she claims to be an Australian citizen while at the same time pretends to be a Chinese patriot, espousing points of view totally in denial of core values upheld by most Australians. When being confronted, she shifted tactics and started firing cheap shots at Australia for shattering her "rosy democracy dream". She could have gotten away with appealing to melodrama if her audience were Chinese-speaking PRC nationals. But she's picked the wrong venue and the wrong audience.

kuifromsydney is a disgrace to whoever she claims to represent. And her effort to taint the image of Australians of Chinese heritage is, above all, most despicable. I could only guess what could be her real intention.

Vacation was over, and the wumaos came back!

C.A.Yeung

Liberty is a core value of western democracy. "Liberal " is a word can be used to describe the supporters of individual rights, equility, freedom of speech. Within the liberals there are moderates and extremists. This is not an American only term. When you tried to justify the US lead wars in which millions killed, you are liberal extremist. When you started your own little smear campaign against China suggesting China has territorial ambition in Australia (based on no concrete evidence) you are an extremist.

I am not labling or name calling you. That is what you have been doing hard. What you said told me what you are.

You started this conversation (17.1) directly aiming at me. The fact that I am being an Australian citizen but having pro-China view, wishing one day to return to China for my retirement make you feel very uncomfortable? You started with claiming that I am an opportunist with no sense of loyalty, then went further to state that I am an opportunist to rip welfare from Australia. This time the only "evidence" you have is the false believe that Australian PRs do not have the welfare access as Australian citizens. That is not the end, You then managed to use the word "liberal extremist" link me to the "funder of jihadi army" who vowed to kill Australian polititians and blow up parliament house. And certainly you did not forget to claim that I learn "from CCP propoganda school". Do you think you went too far???

Ofcourse not. You make your attempts to discredit me even more clearer in your latest post. "back to the original argument" that I am" a disgrace", "discredited herself", "totally in denial of core values upheld by most Australians". These are your original argument, to discredit a blogger who has views that are difference from yours.

Total and complete personal attacks.

As I said before your behavoir is an insult to democracy and freedom of speech. You are unable to accept that people have different views. You resort to personal attacks to discredit others. You have no interest to discuss the points I made: democracy is imperfect, democracy has failed to prevent wars and has no mechanism to retrain liberal extremists.

I know what will be in your next post, more personal attacks. I am trying to guess what will I become in your next post, may be a terrorist, may be a CCP spy? Am I already both? Mr or Ms?