<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why China Could Turn Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/</link>
	<description>Daily commentary about China by TIME correspondents.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:46:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alistercock</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>alistercock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4215</guid>
		<description>because chine is a green tea product provider.
http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2300082

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2300082&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Enhanced Kre-Alkalyn&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because chine is a green tea product provider.<br />
<a href="http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2300082" rel="nofollow">http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2300082</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2300082" rel="nofollow"><br />
Enhanced Kre-Alkalyn</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinibaldi1</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4042</link>
		<dc:creator>sinibaldi1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4042</guid>
		<description>The bridge of your flowers.

A cold wind
calls to mind
the love for
a tender decoy, 
while my delicate
dream invents
in the candle
a reflection of
love.

Francesco Sinibaldi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bridge of your flowers.</p>
<p>A cold wind<br />
calls to mind<br />
the love for<br />
a tender decoy,<br />
while my delicate<br />
dream invents<br />
in the candle<br />
a reflection of<br />
love.</p>
<p>Francesco Sinibaldi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinatsunami</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4010</link>
		<dc:creator>chinatsunami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4010</guid>
		<description>Listen to what Gao Ren has to say today:

國民黨失浩然正氣

二十世紀六十年代，《紐約時報》有報道說，宋美齡是蔣介石的第三任夫人而非元配，宋當時正好在紐約，看後怒不可遏，立即命令駐美大使周書楷前去交涉，要求該報更正、道歉。周以為此事難辦，且報道屬實，拖延久之。因此惹惱了宋美齡，將周叫到寓所，宋問周何以不照指令辦事。周說這是在美國，讓人家更正道歉很難，宋不依不饒，爭執之下，周耐不住性子，說：「我是中華民國的大使，不是你的僕人！」宋美齡聽後伸出巴掌，掃了周一耳光，大聲說：「我就是中華民國！」 
我覺得宋美齡的話真有浩然正氣。今天在台灣，有誰說得出這句話？馬英九也沒勇氣說一句「我就是中華民國」，以致達賴訪台問題他召集閣僚開了五個鐘頭會所作的決定竟是如此烏龍。要營造兩岸良好互動關係談何容易，十年二十年也未必見功；要破壞則三兩天就足夠，就像紅衞兵「破四舊」，說破就破，但要「立四新」，何時才立得起來？

毛澤東說：「台灣還是蔣介石當總統好。」指的是老蔣堅持「一個中國」。其實，老蔣治台最好，因為他本是治全中國的領袖，退守台灣，治小片海島，當然游刃有餘。蔣經國得其真傳，也有卓越成就。隨後就是「一蟹不如一蟹」，淪落到今天，連「台獨」女將陳菊都可耀武揚威。還有誰有資格彰顯「大中至正」？

九七之前，我寫遊戲文章，說「港人治港」不如「國共合作治港」。現在想起，覺得我這主意是不錯的，至少不會將香港治得如今這個模樣。

劉濟昆</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to what Gao Ren has to say today:</p>
<p>國民黨失浩然正氣</p>
<p>二十世紀六十年代，《紐約時報》有報道說，宋美齡是蔣介石的第三任夫人而非元配，宋當時正好在紐約，看後怒不可遏，立即命令駐美大使周書楷前去交涉，要求該報更正、道歉。周以為此事難辦，且報道屬實，拖延久之。因此惹惱了宋美齡，將周叫到寓所，宋問周何以不照指令辦事。周說這是在美國，讓人家更正道歉很難，宋不依不饒，爭執之下，周耐不住性子，說：「我是中華民國的大使，不是你的僕人！」宋美齡聽後伸出巴掌，掃了周一耳光，大聲說：「我就是中華民國！」<br />
我覺得宋美齡的話真有浩然正氣。今天在台灣，有誰說得出這句話？馬英九也沒勇氣說一句「我就是中華民國」，以致達賴訪台問題他召集閣僚開了五個鐘頭會所作的決定竟是如此烏龍。要營造兩岸良好互動關係談何容易，十年二十年也未必見功；要破壞則三兩天就足夠，就像紅衞兵「破四舊」，說破就破，但要「立四新」，何時才立得起來？</p>
<p>毛澤東說：「台灣還是蔣介石當總統好。」指的是老蔣堅持「一個中國」。其實，老蔣治台最好，因為他本是治全中國的領袖，退守台灣，治小片海島，當然游刃有餘。蔣經國得其真傳，也有卓越成就。隨後就是「一蟹不如一蟹」，淪落到今天，連「台獨」女將陳菊都可耀武揚威。還有誰有資格彰顯「大中至正」？</p>
<p>九七之前，我寫遊戲文章，說「港人治港」不如「國共合作治港」。現在想起，覺得我這主意是不錯的，至少不會將香港治得如今這個模樣。</p>
<p>劉濟昆</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conscienceinchina</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4009</link>
		<dc:creator>conscienceinchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4009</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what I posted on another blog, for testing if you have lost your face function of flushing:

It’s not the first time “the China Blog” censored me. They didn’t obstruct all my comments, but leaving some meaningless words such as my questioning and complaining for their censoring behaviors, and preventing my real contents. When I re-posted my texts, I were notified a message pointing out the repeated posting, showing they had received them. A few comments had ever been delayed to display later. Now you can see what floods “the China Blog”’s comment part. Is that what they want to see?

Now I can’t help to suspect what has been done by those who have been longing for cooperation with the CCP regime therefore opening China’s market. You must have heard the stories about the IT giants Yahoo, Google and Microsoft. Yahoo cooperated with the CCP secret police to detain several dissidents by offering their online registered profiles; Google’s Chinese version censors most “sensitive” words; A recent report exposed the Microsoft’s search engine “Bing” carried out much stricter censorship for Chinese netizens. For more details, see this: http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/microsoft-and-chinese-censorship/

And I have ever experienced the embarrassment of “BBC’s James Reynolds’ China”, and I have heard what happened in the Chinese department of “the Deutsche Welle(the voice of Germany )”, etc. Who should we trust now? The poor Chinese people may only be saved by themselves.

http://underthejacaranda.wordpress.com/2009/07/29/rumours-about-the-gfw/#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what I posted on another blog, for testing if you have lost your face function of flushing:</p>
<p>It's not the first time “the China Blog” censored me. They didn't obstruct all my comments, but leaving some meaningless words such as my questioning and complaining for their censoring behaviors, and preventing my real contents. When I re-posted my texts, I were notified a message pointing out the repeated posting, showing they had received them. A few comments had ever been delayed to display later. Now you can see what floods “the China Blog”'s comment part. Is that what they want to see?</p>
<p>Now I can't help to suspect what has been done by those who have been longing for cooperation with the CCP regime therefore opening China's market. You must have heard the stories about the IT giants Yahoo, Google and Microsoft. Yahoo cooperated with the CCP secret police to detain several dissidents by offering their online registered profiles; Google's Chinese version censors most “sensitive” words; A recent report exposed the Microsoft's search engine “Bing” carried out much stricter censorship for Chinese netizens. For more details, see this: <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/microsoft-and-chinese-censorship/" rel="nofollow">http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/microsoft-and-chinese-censorship/</a></p>
<p>And I have ever experienced the embarrassment of “BBC's James Reynolds' China”, and I have heard what happened in the Chinese department of “the Deutsche Welle(the voice of Germany )”, etc. Who should we trust now? The poor Chinese people may only be saved by themselves.</p>
<p><a href="http://underthejacaranda.wordpress.com/2009/07/29/rumours-about-the-gfw/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://underthejacaranda.wordpress.com/2009/07/29/rumours-about-the-gfw/#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conscienceinchina</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator>conscienceinchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4008</guid>
		<description>Any explanation for your block?

The writers of &quot;TIME&quot;: If you were not blind, deaf, or losing your remains of conscience, you should have noted what is happening in China, because you are outcomers, who must be much more sensitive to the unfairness, darkness, putridness, oddness and so on here. Yet now review your themes and topics totally please! Harmonious! really! right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any explanation for your block?</p>
<p>The writers of "TIME": If you were not blind, deaf, or losing your remains of conscience, you should have noted what is happening in China, because you are outcomers, who must be much more sensitive to the unfairness, darkness, putridness, oddness and so on here. Yet now review your themes and topics totally please! Harmonious! really! right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conscienceinchina</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>conscienceinchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>Will &quot;the China Blog&quot; be shut out? Maybe! This piece was posted nearly one week ago.

Or you are being taken over by your new master CCP?

Maybe you are in a cleft stick now. Censoring the like of me, you will lost your personality and dignity, if you have, while ignoring us, you will offend your big brother CCP, right?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will "the China Blog" be shut out? Maybe! This piece was posted nearly one week ago.</p>
<p>Or you are being taken over by your new master CCP?</p>
<p>Maybe you are in a cleft stick now. Censoring the like of me, you will lost your personality and dignity, if you have, while ignoring us, you will offend your big brother CCP, right?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conscienceinchina</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>conscienceinchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>Ban any more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ban any more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsmith9876</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsmith9876</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>Comments on this post really show that Chinese are not racists:
http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/wsyz/150198571.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments on this post really show that Chinese are not racists:<br />
<a href="http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/wsyz/150198571.html" rel="nofollow">http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/wsyz/150198571.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinatsunami</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>chinatsunami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>Remember what a commie witch-hunt paranoid J. Edgar Hoover said:

&quot;Communism, in reality, is not a political party. It is a way of life, it is evil and malignant way of life&quot;.

Maybe it has some truth. Come to think of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember what a commie witch-hunt paranoid J. Edgar Hoover said:</p>
<p>"Communism, in reality, is not a political party. It is a way of life, it is evil and malignant way of life".</p>
<p>Maybe it has some truth. Come to think of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsmith9876</title>
		<link>http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/08/28/why-china-could-turn-green/comment-page-1/#comment-4000</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsmith9876</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://china.blogs.time.com/?p=2346#comment-4000</guid>
		<description>&quot;P.S. There is nothing here about China &quot;turning green&quot;. I wonder why.&quot;

Red is green with Chinese characteristics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"P.S. There is nothing here about China "turning green". I wonder why."</p>
<p>Red is green with Chinese characteristics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
