Daily commentary about China by TIME correspondents.

What Xu Zhiyong Stands For

On the China Beat blog, our former colleague Susan Jakes takes a look at the breadth and boldness of detained legal scholar Xu Zhiyong's work:

Xu has a knack for seeing what's possible where others see only futility. In 2003 and again in 2006 he ran as one of China's handful of independent—that is, not CCP pre-approved—candidates in an election for his district People's Congress. He not only won by a landslide, but in both of his terms in office has sought to prove through his actions—by providing constituent services, demanding budget reviews, preventing the relocation of the Beijing Zoo and lobbying on behalf of aggrieved dog owners—that the congress was not the parody of a political institution it sometimes seemed to be. “Actually,” he explained, “the People's Congress has real power. It's just that people don't take it seriously.” I interviewed Xu shortly after his first election. When I asked him how he decided to run, he looked at me evenly for a moment before replying. “I ran,” he said, “because the law allows me to.”

          

Arrested Lawyer's "Chinese Dream"

The lawyer Xu Zhiyong disappeared in Beijing one week ago, but now his image is popping up all over town. Xu, who was taken from his house by police, is featured in the latest edition of Shishang Xiansheng, the Chinese version of Esquire. He is one of 60 people interviewed by the magazine in recent months about their idea of the Chinese dream. The police haven't explained the charges against Xu, but his brother told the Associated Press that officials at the university where Xu taught said he was being held for tax evasion. The Open Constitution Initiative (or Gongmeng in Chinese), a legal advocacy group that Xu founded, was shuttered by tax authorities last month over allegations it owes $208,000 in taxes. Many observers think the closure is more likely related to Gongmeng's pioneering work on sensitive legal cases.

In the Esquire piece Xu is pictured with a white light behind his head and wearing a French-cuffed shirt and tie--not, by any means, his usual attire. He is featured with six other activists. Here, via China Digital Times, is a translation of his Chinese dream:

I wish our country could be a free and happy one. Every citizen does not need go against their conscience and can find their own place by their virtue and talents; a simple and happy society, where the goodness of humanity is expanded to the maximum, and the evilness of humanity is constrained to the maximum; honesty, trust, kindness, and helping each other are everyday occurences in life; there is not so much anger and anxiety, a pure smile on everyone's face.

IMG_1434

          

As Honest As...

A recent web survey by a Chinese magazine has found that prostitutes are more trustworthy than government officials. The result comes from a web survey, not the most trustworthy form of surveying itself. But the China Daily deemed it "unusual." Perhaps not. Prostitution is illegal here but amazingly widespread. A visiting editor once expressed her admiration for the employees of Chinese salons that stay open late into the night. I didn't have the heart to tell her that they weren't there to cut hair. Hair salons are a typical front for prostitution on the mainland, and they persist because of official corruption and indifference. That type of corruption is probably why officials scored so poorly in the recent survey. Citizens can never be sure about officials' purity. But when you step into a pink-lit hair salon after midnight, there isn't much question.

          

Video: Poker Comes to China

To follow up on an earlier article, Does Poker Stand a Chance in Asia?, here's a video about one of Macau's biggest poker tournaments.

          

Can China Save the World?

The current issue of TIME's Asian and South Pacific editions features this cover package: Can China Save the World? by Bill Powell and Into the Unknown by Michael Elliott.

          

Leading Chinese Rights Lawyer Detained

Beijing authorities have detained the head a legal research and advocacy group, the latest blow in a continued drive against China's activist lawyers. Police took Xu Zhiyong, a human right lawyer who runs the recently shuttered Open Constitution Initiative (or Gongmeng in Chinese), from his Beijing apartment early Wednesday morning, according to a posting on the group's website. Another Gongmeng employee, Zhuang Lu, was also detained.

Earlier this month police closed the Open Constitution Initiative on the grounds that it owed $208,000 in tax penalties. Xu admitted the possibility of flaws in the group's bookkeeping, but its closure and now his arrest indicate that this is more than just a question of accounting. In recent years OCI has been involved in a variety of sensitive cases including last year's tainted milk powder scandal, defending a waitress who stabbed to death a Communist Party official, and investigating the causes of last year's Tibetan unrest. Rather than actively oppose the government, their goal has been to work within the system, fighting for the rights granted citizens under Chinese law.

That sort of loyal opposition would seem to offer OCI a measure of defense. In interviews Xu denied that there was anything controversial about the group's work, that they were merely helping China develop the rule of law. But for activists pursuing a similar agenda this has been a perilous summer. More than 50 lawyers who handle sensitive rights cases have had their licenses revoked. And this week authorities also raided a Beijing group that works with hepatitis patients, apparently because they were not authorized to print an anti-discrimination newsletter.

          

Farcical Case Concludes

The conclusion of the hearing into the disputed estate of late tycoon Nina Wang comes as a relief to Hongkongers, who no longer have to be confronted, on a daily basis, with even more tales of baseness, superstition and venality than already fill our lives. Those unfamiliar with the story—it is hard to think who they might be, given that the proceedings have been the stuff of sniggering news briefs and lurid dispatches worldwide—can make use of the following précis: eccentric billionairess with infantile streak (wore pigtails, bobby socks, and answered to the nickname “Little Sweetie”), dies at 70. Two wills are produced. One instructs that her fortune be given to her family run Chinachem Charitable Foundation; the other bestows everything upon a grinning feng-shui “master” Tony Chan who claimed to have been her lover. Cue court case of the decade.

Chan already made an astonishing $250mn out of Wang in payments for his asinine voodoo. But he nonetheless has no problems with publicly squabbling with a charity for the rest of the loot and in the process subjecting his wretched wife with the testified banalities of his relationship with Wang (building model aircraft was apparently one of the activities enjoyed by the dowager and the eunuch, as Wang's sister contemptuously described the couple).

Justice Johnson Lam will bang the gavel on the case in September, after hearing closing arguments. Let's hope he makes the right call.

          

My colleague Ishaan Tharoor writes here about how Beijing has begun bulldozing the old city section of Xinjiang's Kashgar, the ancient center of the Silk Road, in a move that critics worry is aimed at further dismantling local Uighur heritage.

          

Here's Simon's recent piece on how a comment by a Shanghai family-planning official, which made headlines around the world, was nothing more than a reiteration of a long-held policy allowing parents who are only children to have more than one child. And here's a brief history of China's one-child policy.

          

California Apologizes to Chinese Americans

And here's my piece on California's landmark apology to Chinese Americans for the racist laws enacted against them as far back as the Gold Rush era. The laws, some of which were not repealed until the 1940s, barred Chinese from owning land or property, marrying whites, working in the public sector and testifying against whites in court.